<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Themes In 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-themes-in-2009/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-themes-in-2009</link>
	<description>Where Every Drink Is On The House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:54:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-themes-in-2009#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=542#comment-474</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-401&quot; rel=&quot;reply&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JD Hartley&lt;/a&gt; - Well, I think it doesn&#039;t matter who makes the theme, if it&#039;s bundled into WordPress people are going to use it as a starting point. That&#039;s just the way it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-401" rel="reply" rel="nofollow">JD Hartley</a> &#8211; Well, I think it doesn&#8217;t matter who makes the theme, if it&#8217;s bundled into WordPress people are going to use it as a starting point. That&#8217;s just the way it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLeuze</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-themes-in-2009#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>JLeuze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=542#comment-402</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-401&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JD Hartley&lt;/a&gt; -I could see that being a problem if they shipped it with a new theme that was already existing. But if they add a totally new theme, then even if it becomes cliche overnight, it&#039;s no great loss.

I&#039;m hoping they drop Classic and Kubrick and ship &lt;em&gt;two&lt;/em&gt; new themes with WordPress, a really light framework, and a more finish theme built on that framework. Then the intention is for the themes that ship with it to be merely a starting point, which I think would cause the number of themes to grow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-401" rel="nofollow">JD Hartley</a> -I could see that being a problem if they shipped it with a new theme that was already existing. But if they add a totally new theme, then even if it becomes cliche overnight, it&#8217;s no great loss.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping they drop Classic and Kubrick and ship <em>two</em> new themes with WordPress, a really light framework, and a more finish theme built on that framework. Then the intention is for the themes that ship with it to be merely a starting point, which I think would cause the number of themes to grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD Hartley</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-themes-in-2009#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>JD Hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=542#comment-401</guid>
		<description>I am really hoping that Automattic doesn&#039;t ship a new theme in WordPress--it will just make it so common that no one will use it again.

Maybe they should just not ship it with one at all??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really hoping that Automattic doesn&#8217;t ship a new theme in WordPress&#8211;it will just make it so common that no one will use it again.</p>
<p>Maybe they should just not ship it with one at all??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
