<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Needs To Revise Post Revisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions</link>
	<description>Where Every Drink Is On The House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:56:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-4289</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-4289</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m developing my Wordpress site locally and suddenly noticed how many post revisions I had built up.
I looked around the Dashboard to find an option to delete them or limit them... you know the rest.
Found this post and agree totally with you... will my database just keep filling up with post revisions until it bursts?
I&#039;m using Wordpress 2.8.4, do you recommend the same plugin that you are using to limit post revisions? And... how do I delete the revisions that I have already built up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m developing my WordPress site locally and suddenly noticed how many post revisions I had built up.<br />
I looked around the Dashboard to find an option to delete them or limit them&#8230; you know the rest.<br />
Found this post and agree totally with you&#8230; will my database just keep filling up with post revisions until it bursts?<br />
I&#8217;m using WordPress 2.8.4, do you recommend the same plugin that you are using to limit post revisions? And&#8230; how do I delete the revisions that I have already built up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flick</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Flick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-90</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-52&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John Kolbert&lt;/a&gt; - Sorry about my late reply, and thanks for taking the time to actually write back :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-52" rel="nofollow">John Kolbert</a> &#8211; Sorry about my late reply, and thanks for taking the time to actually write back :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fairwell Keith And Get Well Soon Kym &#124; Weblog Tools Collection</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Fairwell Keith And Get Well Soon Kym &#124; Weblog Tools Collection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-88</guid>
		<description>[...] WordPress MU 2.7 Released BuddyPress 1.0 Beta 2 Released All In One SEO Plugin Hits One Million Downloads WordPress.TV Launches Thank A Plugin Developer Day CForms 2 Removed From The Plugin Repository WordCamp Denver, Feb 28th WordPress Documentation Project Does The Post Revisions Feature Need To Be Revised? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress MU 2.7 Released BuddyPress 1.0 Beta 2 Released All In One SEO Plugin Hits One Million Downloads WordPress.TV Launches Thank A Plugin Developer Day CForms 2 Removed From The Plugin Repository WordCamp Denver, Feb 28th WordPress Documentation Project Does The Post Revisions Feature Need To Be Revised? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-67</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-56&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kim&lt;/a&gt; -

Kim, I&#039;m in total agreement with you. I work with many newbie business owners, who just aren&#039;t &quot;techie&quot;. While some of the skills seem simple to us, it&#039;s an advanced skill to someone who doesn&#039;t understand why you shouldn&#039;t copy and paste from Word!

It&#039;s also the non-techie users that need to be protected from the dreaded db bloat. Many don&#039;t know enough about data bases for the thought to even occur to them. While we don&#039;t need the bloat either, at least we know where to go for help and how to implement the solution.

Expecting new or non-tech folks to dig into code is sort of like expecting every new driver to be able to change the head gasket. The skills may come with time but shouldn&#039;t be required to drive the car.

I like the idea of short &amp; sweet settings being in the UI because I can simply tell people to &quot;change this setting to &quot;X&quot; and there is no chance of them making an oops involving other code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-56" rel="nofollow">Kim</a> -</p>
<p>Kim, I&#8217;m in total agreement with you. I work with many newbie business owners, who just aren&#8217;t &#8220;techie&#8221;. While some of the skills seem simple to us, it&#8217;s an advanced skill to someone who doesn&#8217;t understand why you shouldn&#8217;t copy and paste from Word!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also the non-techie users that need to be protected from the dreaded db bloat. Many don&#8217;t know enough about data bases for the thought to even occur to them. While we don&#8217;t need the bloat either, at least we know where to go for help and how to implement the solution.</p>
<p>Expecting new or non-tech folks to dig into code is sort of like expecting every new driver to be able to change the head gasket. The skills may come with time but shouldn&#8217;t be required to drive the car.</p>
<p>I like the idea of short &amp; sweet settings being in the UI because I can simply tell people to &#8220;change this setting to &#8220;X&#8221; and there is no chance of them making an oops involving other code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-56</guid>
		<description>@Andrew: The encoding for pages/feeds could be moved, but the rest of them need to stay in the UI. The whole purpose of this discussion (I thought) was to get the settings for the post revisions &lt;strong&gt;into&lt;/strong&gt; the WP admin UI, to keep end-users from having to edit wp-config.php to set their preferences.

The less often a user has to mess with wp-config.php, the better. WP has a lot of inexperienced users who could totally bork their blogs if they have to constantly edit the config file. For all users, it is just a pain to have to make those changes in the config file when the UI already exists to take care of them.

Permalinks: This needs to stay in the UI. Troubleshooting an issue with someone&#039;s blog may require setting the permalinks back to default and then reset them back. There are plugins (for example, WP Download Monitor) that require you to reset your permalinks after the plugin is upgraded. A user shouldn&#039;t have to mess with the config file to do this.

Timezone: For those of us who have DST, we would have to edit wp-config.php to change the timezone twice a year. Why move it, when we can already reset it via the UI?

These are just a couple of items you mentioned, but there are reasons why each of them need to stay in the UI, since they are already there. The config file should be a &quot;set it and forget it&quot; once WP is installed.

How about we work together to get the post revisions setting into the UI instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew: The encoding for pages/feeds could be moved, but the rest of them need to stay in the UI. The whole purpose of this discussion (I thought) was to get the settings for the post revisions <strong>into</strong> the WP admin UI, to keep end-users from having to edit wp-config.php to set their preferences.</p>
<p>The less often a user has to mess with wp-config.php, the better. WP has a lot of inexperienced users who could totally bork their blogs if they have to constantly edit the config file. For all users, it is just a pain to have to make those changes in the config file when the UI already exists to take care of them.</p>
<p>Permalinks: This needs to stay in the UI. Troubleshooting an issue with someone&#8217;s blog may require setting the permalinks back to default and then reset them back. There are plugins (for example, WP Download Monitor) that require you to reset your permalinks after the plugin is upgraded. A user shouldn&#8217;t have to mess with the config file to do this.</p>
<p>Timezone: For those of us who have DST, we would have to edit wp-config.php to change the timezone twice a year. Why move it, when we can already reset it via the UI?</p>
<p>These are just a couple of items you mentioned, but there are reasons why each of them need to stay in the UI, since they are already there. The config file should be a &#8220;set it and forget it&#8221; once WP is installed.</p>
<p>How about we work together to get the post revisions setting into the UI instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-55</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-54&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jeffro&lt;/a&gt; - I would also want a checkbox option to delete revisions on publication.

This has got me thinking about UI bloat thought and I think the following could be moved out of UI into wp-config, after all they only need to be set once, and could be part of the setup. After that there is almost never any need to change them unless you are already doing something much more significant.

WordPress Address URL
Blog Address URL
Email Address (the admin one)
Timezone
Date Format
Time Format
Week starts on
Remote Publishing (debatable)
Encoding for pages and feeds
The entire privacy page
The entire permalink settings page
The entire miscellaneous page

If we can all agree that these are not needed in the UI then we can start a campaign to really clean out WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-54" rel="nofollow">Jeffro</a> &#8211; I would also want a checkbox option to delete revisions on publication.</p>
<p>This has got me thinking about UI bloat thought and I think the following could be moved out of UI into wp-config, after all they only need to be set once, and could be part of the setup. After that there is almost never any need to change them unless you are already doing something much more significant.</p>
<p>WordPress Address URL<br />
Blog Address URL<br />
Email Address (the admin one)<br />
Timezone<br />
Date Format<br />
Time Format<br />
Week starts on<br />
Remote Publishing (debatable)<br />
Encoding for pages and feeds<br />
The entire privacy page<br />
The entire permalink settings page<br />
The entire miscellaneous page</p>
<p>If we can all agree that these are not needed in the UI then we can start a campaign to really clean out WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-54</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-53&quot; rel=&quot;reply&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan&lt;/a&gt; - But even you&#039;re compromise requires the editing of the WP-Config file which is unsatisfactory considering the majority user group which uses WordPress and that user group is not made up of advanced users. I still think the best solution is in the WRITING section of the SETTINGS area, there is one line for Revisions. First, you can control whether revisions are used on posts, pages, both, or disabled. Second, a drop down menu or a text field where you can select the maximum number of revisions that are created for the previous selection.

Instead, what we have here is the assumption that ALL WordPress users will want Post Revisions enabled as well as seemingly an infinite number of revisions created. And to top it all off, end users probably don&#039;t even know what&#039;s happening.

I was thinking about this issue at work and I got fired up about it yet again because it&#039;s just plain stupid the way in which your common end user has no control over that feature because it&#039;s assumed that most users won&#039;t bother to configure it and it is UI bloat. I feel as though it&#039;s current implementation is a slap to the face of WordPress users. 

How about the UI admin option to customize how many lines the post box should be even though in the visual editor, you can drag the corner of the box to meet your requirements. Is that UI Bloat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-53" rel="reply" rel="nofollow">Ryan</a> &#8211; But even you&#8217;re compromise requires the editing of the WP-Config file which is unsatisfactory considering the majority user group which uses WordPress and that user group is not made up of advanced users. I still think the best solution is in the WRITING section of the SETTINGS area, there is one line for Revisions. First, you can control whether revisions are used on posts, pages, both, or disabled. Second, a drop down menu or a text field where you can select the maximum number of revisions that are created for the previous selection.</p>
<p>Instead, what we have here is the assumption that ALL WordPress users will want Post Revisions enabled as well as seemingly an infinite number of revisions created. And to top it all off, end users probably don&#8217;t even know what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p>I was thinking about this issue at work and I got fired up about it yet again because it&#8217;s just plain stupid the way in which your common end user has no control over that feature because it&#8217;s assumed that most users won&#8217;t bother to configure it and it is UI bloat. I feel as though it&#8217;s current implementation is a slap to the face of WordPress users. </p>
<p>How about the UI admin option to customize how many lines the post box should be even though in the visual editor, you can drag the corner of the box to meet your requirements. Is that UI Bloat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Perhaps adding the ability to control the number of revisions stored via the wp-config.php file would be a good compromise?

Adding it as a core feature in the admin panel seems a little overkill. But adding a simple line in the wp-config.php file which could be uncommented when necesary seems fairly reasonable to me. Controlling how often the revisions are stored is not as useful IMO as controlling the number of revisions but at least it offers some control to prevent the database size exploding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps adding the ability to control the number of revisions stored via the wp-config.php file would be a good compromise?</p>
<p>Adding it as a core feature in the admin panel seems a little overkill. But adding a simple line in the wp-config.php file which could be uncommented when necesary seems fairly reasonable to me. Controlling how often the revisions are stored is not as useful IMO as controlling the number of revisions but at least it offers some control to prevent the database size exploding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kolbert</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kolbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-52</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-47&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flick&lt;/a&gt; - I&#039;m actually not sure if it works retrospectively. My guess is that it doesn&#039;t and that it will just prevent future posts, though I&#039;m not positive about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-47" rel="nofollow">Flick</a> &#8211; I&#8217;m actually not sure if it works retrospectively. My guess is that it doesn&#8217;t and that it will just prevent future posts, though I&#8217;m not positive about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-needs-to-revise-post-revisions#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=213#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this subject debated on the WP forum and on a few blogs at the time this feature was released. It&#039;s a great feature for some situations, but most single-user blogs are rarely going to have the need for this feature.

The first thing I do when prepping a wp-config.php file for a new WP install is to include the following beforehand:

&lt;code&gt;/** Change X to the number of post revisions you want WordPress to save to the database **/
define (&#039;WP_POST_REVISIONS&#039;, false);&lt;/code&gt;

I turn them off completely, as I don&#039;t want the headache of having to go back in and remove the old revisions from the database.

PS/Jeff, seems you didn&#039;t install the Filosofo Comments Preview plugin on this blog. Could that be installed on this one too? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this subject debated on the WP forum and on a few blogs at the time this feature was released. It&#8217;s a great feature for some situations, but most single-user blogs are rarely going to have the need for this feature.</p>
<p>The first thing I do when prepping a wp-config.php file for a new WP install is to include the following beforehand:</p>
<p><code>/** Change X to the number of post revisions you want WordPress to save to the database **/<br />
define ('WP_POST_REVISIONS', false);</code></p>
<p>I turn them off completely, as I don&#8217;t want the headache of having to go back in and remove the old revisions from the database.</p>
<p>PS/Jeff, seems you didn&#8217;t install the Filosofo Comments Preview plugin on this blog. Could that be installed on this one too? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

