<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Dev Chat For 9-10-09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-dev-chat-for-9-10-09/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-dev-chat-for-9-10-09</link>
	<description>Where Every Drink Is On The House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:27:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-dev-chat-for-9-10-09#comment-3729</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=2483#comment-3729</guid>
		<description>Auto upgrade replaces all the files, and likely will continue to do so. It&#039;s good practice, as it is the best way of ensuring that you have a clean, complete WP install.

The &quot;changed/added files only zip&quot; can be downloaded manually from Trac by people who cannot use the auto-upgrade, and who don&#039;t want to manually upload an entire WP install when only some of the files have changed. It&#039;s not going to be a canonical upgrade method — it&#039;s just a handy shortcut for a small group of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Auto upgrade replaces all the files, and likely will continue to do so. It&#8217;s good practice, as it is the best way of ensuring that you have a clean, complete WP install.</p>
<p>The &#8220;changed/added files only zip&#8221; can be downloaded manually from Trac by people who cannot use the auto-upgrade, and who don&#8217;t want to manually upload an entire WP install when only some of the files have changed. It&#8217;s not going to be a canonical upgrade method — it&#8217;s just a handy shortcut for a small group of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spamboy</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-dev-chat-for-9-10-09#comment-3727</link>
		<dc:creator>Spamboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=2483#comment-3727</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;it looks like it is possible to show a link in the backend of WordPress during an upgrade which will contain a zipfile of just the changed files for that version.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This solves my concern that we discussed on Twitter, which means that there won&#039;t be overt promotion of multiple upgrade methods.  Having just a link within the administration panel is rather minor.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Auto upgrade should be the primary upgrade method with uploading only the changed files coming in second. Last would be replacing all of the files.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It was always my assumption that auto-upgrade was replacing all of the files.  If it&#039;s not, does what occurs during an auto-upgrade equate to what occurs with &quot;uploading only the changed files&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>it looks like it is possible to show a link in the backend of WordPress during an upgrade which will contain a zipfile of just the changed files for that version.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This solves my concern that we discussed on Twitter, which means that there won&#8217;t be overt promotion of multiple upgrade methods.  Having just a link within the administration panel is rather minor.</p>
<blockquote><p>Auto upgrade should be the primary upgrade method with uploading only the changed files coming in second. Last would be replacing all of the files.</p></blockquote>
<p>It was always my assumption that auto-upgrade was replacing all of the files.  If it&#8217;s not, does what occurs during an auto-upgrade equate to what occurs with &#8220;uploading only the changed files&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realistdreamer</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-dev-chat-for-9-10-09#comment-3703</link>
		<dc:creator>realistdreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=2483#comment-3703</guid>
		<description>One idea I had for a site as a service to the WP community was a Google Custom search for plugins and better categorization than tags provide.  At 6500 plugins, most of what I find is a waste.  They need an advanced search by category, rating, etc.  I&#039;m sure they have bigger fish to fry, but anyone (hint, hint) could throw up a Google custom search with labels and filters to get current year, and keyword categories.  I find that I need to do that myself to be sure I&#039;ve found everything out there without looking through the many abandoned projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One idea I had for a site as a service to the WP community was a Google Custom search for plugins and better categorization than tags provide.  At 6500 plugins, most of what I find is a waste.  They need an advanced search by category, rating, etc.  I&#8217;m sure they have bigger fish to fry, but anyone (hint, hint) could throw up a Google custom search with labels and filters to get current year, and keyword categories.  I find that I need to do that myself to be sure I&#8217;ve found everything out there without looking through the many abandoned projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.wptavern.com/wordpress-dev-chat-for-9-10-09#comment-3702</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wptavern.com/?p=2483#comment-3702</guid>
		<description>I have write many plugins and i use the base64-function for inlude images, not as a file, only for include with php; better performance; little bid faster. I dont like your idea for scan the plugin-directory for the base64 function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have write many plugins and i use the base64-function for inlude images, not as a file, only for include with php; better performance; little bid faster. I dont like your idea for scan the plugin-directory for the base64 function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
