Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Compress This Image

  1. #11
    Jeffro's Avatar
    Jeffro is offline WPTavern Forum Admin
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chipbennett View Post
    Though, that shelf of GPL mugs over there sure looks precarious...
    Those are the GPL mugs I've glued back together. I didn't bother buying new ones because I knew eventually, they will end up on the floor again in even smaller pieces.

  2. #12
    Rarst's Avatar
    Rarst is offline Big Tipper
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    322

    Default

    @chipbennett

    Naturally you lose details when you throw out over half of image. :) I also excluded some darker parts, because such spots are too obviously repetitive with smaller pattern.

    I provided two images so Jeffro could choose if he wants one that looks almost exactly like original or one less detailed but even smaller.

    So aside from some largish banners (I assume Jeffro has no control over) imagery is fine.

    Next thing to poke is probably JavaScript - 23 scripts is overkill.

    By the way, Jeffro, I think you had tried W3 Total Cache but something didn't work? Are you going to try it again on finalized (I hope) host? It is pain to setup but it is currently the most functional caching plugin. I moved my blog to it myself recently and was very impressed. Liked it more than Hyper Cache. And I liked Hyper Cache more than Super Cache which makes W3 double more likable. :)
    Rarst.net - cynical thoughts on software and web (and sometimes WP) | @Rarst | I seem to be non-GPL-compliant person. Beware my poisonous thoughts.

  3. #13
    Ryan's Avatar
    Ryan is offline WordPress Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,801

    Default

    +1 for W3 Cache.

    Caching does have it's downsides, but the performance and CPU load improvements are worth it if you can do it.

    I've been quite startled when visiting my own personal blog recently and seeing how much more quickly the pages are loading now that I've compressed the bajeesus out of them and cached them. My next step is to use Amazon Cloudfront, but I haven't gotten around to setting that up yet.

  4. #14
    chipbennett's Avatar
    chipbennett is offline WordPress Legend
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rarst View Post
    @chipbennett

    Naturally you lose details when you throw out over half of image. :) I also excluded some darker parts, because such spots are too obviously repetitive with smaller pattern.
    Oh, I know. :) And, ironically, it was some of the *lighter* spots that I noticed were missing.

    I provided two images so Jeffro could choose if he wants one that looks almost exactly like original or one less detailed but even smaller.
    No worries. The one I cropped attempted to leave behind all of the original content, with exactly no overlap.

    Honestly, the one you provided - and that Jeff is now using - looks great! It's not *exactly* like the original, but who cares? The intended look is there, and it works well.

    So aside from some largish banners (I assume Jeffro has no control over) imagery is fine.

    Next thing to poke is probably JavaScript - 23 scripts is overkill.
    Yep. That was the primary culprit for slowing my site down, too. I've pared my external scripts down to only a handful - and almost all (except for site analytics) only display on the front page.

    By the way, Jeffro, I think you had tried W3 Total Cache but something didn't work? Are you going to try it again on finalized (I hope) host? It is pain to setup but it is currently the most functional caching plugin. I moved my blog to it myself recently and was very impressed. Liked it more than Hyper Cache. And I liked Hyper Cache more than Super Cache which makes W3 double more likable. :)
    I had a similar experience. The first time I tried W3 Total Cache, it white-screened the front-end of my site. I tried it again a few weeks later, though (with no settings changes, as far as I can tell), and it now works just fine. So, Jeff should definitely give it another shot.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
    +1 for W3 Cache.

    Caching does have it's downsides, but the performance and CPU load improvements are worth it if you can do it.
    A +1 from me, too, for W3 Total Cache.

    I've been quite startled when visiting my own personal blog recently and seeing how much more quickly the pages are loading now that I've compressed the bajeesus out of them and cached them. My next step is to use Amazon Cloudfront, but I haven't gotten around to setting that up yet.
    Even just using the page caching and file compression, I have noticed observable improvements. I've not tried using the "minify" feature, as I think I'm getting good enough performance without it. (And I'm not exactly a heavy load. My highest traffic day (ever) was around 500 page views a couple weeks ago - and that was a definite spike from the 100-150 average.)
    WP TurnKey - Turn-Key WordPress installation and maintenance services
    WordPress user since 2005 | @chip_bennett | chipbennett.net | cbnet Plugins

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •