| Home | Forum | Advertise | Contact Me | About WPTavern | WPWeekly Show Info |
![]() |
| |||||||
| Business Thinktank Running a business on or around WordPress. Also an idea center |
![]() |
| | Share | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
|
Hi guys, I have a potential product in mind that I'd like to run by the tavern thinktank. As opposed to hardcore developer frameworks (Thematic, Hybrid) with tons of custom functions, this idea would be geared more toward front-end people like myself who need to rapidly mock up and build client sites. It's a baseline theme (codenamed "Gravy") which I've used for tons of WP projects over the years. It contains some Mimbo features and useful custom stuff, yet is basically just the essentials, neatly organized and commented. I also have a set of PSD files with nested layers that match the class names and markup structure of the theme, all based around a 12-column 960px grid that matches the guides: ![]() ![]() Here is the live demo On a personal level, the combination of the theme and PSDs has sped up my design/build process tremendously. I never do a WP project without it. Because of the consistent CSS/PSD layer naming scheme, it's also made it much easier to pass work back and forth among other designers. I also have pre-cropped PSDs for standard images like the magnifying glass, RSS icon, comments icon and so forth. I'm thinking of bundling all this together, writing some tutorials, offering support (mostly for CSS and layout mods) and including a child theme or two to add value. I'd keep the price fairly low and continue offering free upgrades and fixes as needed. Code-wise, it's not nearly as ambitious as, say, Thematic, but that's not really the purpose. I guess it kind of blurs the line between baseline theme and framework, and that's part of why I'm conflicted about how to sell it or how to price it. I would definitely not offer a product on my own site that I didn't think was valuable to designers. But I also don't want anyone confused as to why this would cost $10(-ish) whereas Hybrid or Thematic are free. I guess the trick is informing users that Gravy is geared toward a different audience and a different philosophy. It's handy for building small-business sites that probably will not be upgrading Gravy regularly -- designers would use it to rapidly build a client site and then be done with it, unlike Thematic where it's likely that as a 'parent theme' it will continue being updated. Anyway, I know the overall package has value, I'm not just the world's best marketing-minded person to express it. I also realize there are probably some contradictions here, as the idea is not fully fleshed out, but any feedback is definitely appreciated. Last edited by Darren Hoyt; 07-02-2009 at 11:29 PM.. |
| |||
|
I think it's a great idea, Darren. Like you said, it's for a specific sort of developer. It will work for those that are building themes a certain way. Building off of frameworks, probably not interested. But building something that will stand on its own, probably interested. The killer here is how you have the folder groups matching the div classes/IDs. That will help tons of people bridge the gap between the design and the CSS. My prediction, anyway. I'd definitely be interested in kicking the tires, posting about it, etc. Keep us udpated. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |